Proimos v. Devin Cahn Associates Inc.
| Alex Proimos |
| Devin Cahn Associates Inc. |
| 8:2023cv02710 |
| November 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and Plaintiff's "Notice of Voluntary Dismissal" (Doc. #8), this action is dismissed with prejudice, with all parties to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 1/14/2024. (EKB)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Alex Proimos (Quintero, Marian) |
| Filing 7 Copyright Report electronically sent to the U.S. Copyright Office. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (BGR) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER: On the basis of Plaintiff's "Notice of Settlement" (Doc. #5), this cause is hereby dismissed, without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within 60 days of the date hereof, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, or request an extension of time, should they so choose, or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that 60-day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 12/4/2023. (EKB)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of settlement by Alex Proimos (Quintero, Marian) |
| Filing 4 Copyright Report electronically sent to the U.S. Copyright Office. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Complaint with Attachments) (JDR) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Devin Cahn Associates Inc. (JDR) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:23-cv-2710-TPB-CPT. (RLK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Devin Cahn Associates Inc. with Jury Demand (Injunctive Relief Demanded) (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21502151) filed by Alex Proimos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(Quintero, Marian) Modified on 11/29/2023 to edit docket text and Chambers notified (JDR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Proimos v. Devin Cahn Associates Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alex Proimos | |
| Represented By: | Joel B. Rothman |
| Represented By: | Marian V. Quintero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Devin Cahn Associates Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
