Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Erik Widell Lewis
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 8:2023cv02715
Filed: November 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2024 Filing 8 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix, #3 Appendix, #4 Appendix, #5 Appendix, #6 Appendix, #7 Appendix, #8 Appendix, #9 Appendix, #10 Appendix)(Blake, Richard)
January 26, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Richard Blake on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. Lead Counsel: Richard Blake. (Blake, Richard)
November 29, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Erik Widell Lewis. Related case(s): No (Avard, Carol)
November 29, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Carol Ann Avard on behalf of Erik Widell Lewis. Lead Counsel: Carol Avard. (Avard, Carol)
November 29, 2023 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Erik Widell Lewis. (Avard, Carol)
November 29, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE: Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) became effective on December 1, 2022. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules also apply to this proceeding except to the extent they are inconsistent with the supplemental rules. The Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases entered on December 7, 2021, no longer applies. The parties must review the supplemental rules to determine the governing deadlines, including the deadline to file the plaintiff's brief, the Commissioner's brief, and the plaintiff's reply brief. (JDR)
November 28, 2023 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:23-cv-02715-AEP. (JG)
November 28, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-21503992). The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Erik Widell Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Avard, Carol)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erik Widell Lewis
Represented By: Carol Ann Avard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John F. Rudy, III
Represented By: Nadine DeLuca Elder
Represented By: Richard Blake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?