Arrington v. Pinellas County, Florida
| Ashton Mayhew Arrington |
| Pinellas County, Florida |
| 8:2023cv02889 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER dismissing case with prejudice. The Clerk will terminate motions and close. In this matter, no filing fee or motion for in forma pauperis consideration has been filed. Plaintiff Father seeks an emergency order to have holiday visitation with his son in a domestic matter. The Plaintiff seeks an order compelling the Pinellas domestic relations judge to permit same, and an injunction requiring that Pinellas domestic relations judge to recuse himself. He cites Florida, federal, and United Nations law grounds, noting that the denial of holiday visitation intrudes upon these rights. Doc. 2 at 3. The Plaintiff requests from the undersigned "a thorough judicial review of [Pinellas domestic relations] Judge Steve D. Berlin's handling of the case" to make sure the rules and Plaintiff's rights are respected, and Plaintiff can get holiday visitation with his son. He asks the undersigned to take over this family law matter from the Pinellas Courts. Doc. 3 at 2. Plaintiff also objects to the domestic relations judge dismissing "disturbing images I submitted depicting a situation involving my son's mother's twin brother, despite their alarming nature." Doc. 3 at 1. Also the former wife has not participated appropriately in the domestic litigation. Id. at 2. Regrettably this Court has no power to superintend Judge Berlin or assume control of this domestic relations case. This Court cannot interfere in state domestic relations matters. Plaintiff should seek relief in the state court system, in Pinellas County and in the Second District (Florida) Court of Appeals. Federal courts do not sit in review of state domestic relations courts and have no such power. Plaintiff should devote his effort to the state system and seek relief there. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 12/20/2023. (Jung, William)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JCG) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JCG) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Recusal, Reassignment to a Different Judge and Request for Jurisdiction by the U.S. District Court by Ashton Mayhew Arrington. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
| Filing 2 EMERGENCY MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to Ensure Holiday Visitation by Ashton Mayhew Arrington. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pinellas County, Florida filed by Ashton Mayhew Arrington. (No payment received and no IPF filed) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arrington v. Pinellas County, Florida | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ashton Mayhew Arrington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pinellas County, Florida | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
