United States of America, Department of Justice v. City of Tampa, Florida
| United States of America, Department of Justice |
| City of Tampa, Florida |
| 8:2023cv02934 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in support re #12 Motion for Settlement by Entry of a Consent Decree filed by United States of America, Department of Justice. (Morrison, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 12 Amended MOTION for Settlement by Entry of a Consent Decree by United States of America, Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-proposed Consent Decree, #2 Exhibit 2-Stipulation, #3 Exhibit 3-Burger Aff., #4 Exhibit 4-Leave Policy, #5 Exhibit 5- Burger email exchange, #6 Exhibit 6-Burger leave request)(Morrison, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Standing Order by City of Tampa, Florida. (Gonzalez, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by City of Tampa, Florida. Related case(s): No (Gonzalez, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Thomas M. Gonzalez on behalf of City of Tampa, Florida. Lead Counsel: Thomas M. Gonzalez. (Gonzalez, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER of service returned executed on 01/23/2024 by United States of America, Department of Justice as to City of Tampa, Florida. (Morrison, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by United States of America, Department of Justice. (Morrison, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by United States of America, Department of Justice. Related case(s): No (Morrison, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Joint Motion to Approve Consent Judgment. The Parties must file a renewed motion containing the requisite facts by evidence, affidavit, or stipulation by February 2, 2024. In the alternative, the United States may voluntarily dismiss this action based on the Parties' agreement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 1/19/2024. (ZG)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL CASE STANDING ORDER. The Parties shall meet and file a Case Management Report using the standard form on the Court's website within forty days after any Defendant appears. Each Party must also file a Corporate Disclosure Statement using the standard template attached to this Order (also available on the undersigned's website under the "forms" tab) within fourteen days after appearing. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 1/9/2024. (ZG)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:23-cv-2934-KKM-AAS. (AA) |
| Filing 2 Joint MOTION for Settlement by Entry of Consent Decree by United States of America, Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Morrison, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Tampa, Florida with Jury Demand filed by United States of America, Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Morrison, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
