Clarke v. Commissioner of Social Security
Latonya Clarke |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
8:2023cv02990 |
December 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Amanda Arnold Sansone |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Commissioner of Social Security. (Thorp, Whitney) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Commissioner of Social Security. Related case(s): No (Thorp, Whitney) |
Filing 7 Notice of substitution of AUSA. Whitney Livengood Thorp substituting for Nadine DeLuca Elder. (Thorp, Whitney) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 1/2/2024. (BEE) |
Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:23-cv-02990-AAS. (TRF) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Latonya Clarke. (Quick, Jason) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Daniel Quick on behalf of Latonya Clarke (Quick, Jason) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Latonya Clarke. (Quick, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Latonya Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Quick, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.