Anderson v. Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation
| Derek Tyrone Anderson |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation |
| 8:2024cv00045 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Natalie Hirt Adams |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Mary S Scriven |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Case Reassigned to Judge Mary S. Scriven. New case number: 8:24-cv-45-MSS-NHA. Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington no longer assigned to the case. (JNB) |
Filing 20
ENDORSED ORDER: In accord with Local Rule 1.07(a), the unopposed motion to transfer (Doc. #18) is granted. This case is transferred to the Honorable Mary S. Scriven with her consent. The Clerk is directed to effectuate transfer. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/22/2024. (DMD)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to complete and return the "Summons in a Civil Action" AO 440 form and the "Process Receipt and Return" USM-285 form to the Clerk, whereupon the United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summons on Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams on 1/17/2024. (CJF)
|
| Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to Transfer Under Local Rule 1.07(a) by Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. Related case(s): Yes (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 10 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Corporate Parent Cognizant Domestic Holdings Corporation for Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Tori Simmons on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. Lead Counsel: Tori C. Simmons. (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Derek Tyrone Anderson. (Printy, Gary) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Derek Tyrone Anderson. Related case(s): Yes (Printy, Gary) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Gary L. Printy, Jr on behalf of Derek Tyrone Anderson. Lead Counsel: Gary L. Printy, Jr. (Printy, Gary) Modified text on 1/8/2024 (GL). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Fred Conwell Marshall, II, Gary L. Printy, Jr. of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (EAM) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.03, which requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), which requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER: The Court is aware of the notice entered in this case, explaining that Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the filing of a uniform case management report with forty or seventy days, depending on the circumstances of the case. However, under Local Rule 1.01(b), a judge can modify or suspend for all or part of an action the application of any rule, except Rule 1.05(a). This Court finds it beneficial to enter a fast-track scheduling order in certain categories of cases before entry of a case management and scheduling order. Additionally, in cases that are not fast-tracked, this Court finds it efficient to have the parties confer and file case management reports within 14 days after the defendant's responsive pleading is due or within 14 days after a case is removed to this Court. In light of this, the Court hereby suspends Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) in this case. At a time the Court deems appropriate, the Court will enter a further order in this case setting either a deadline to file a completed uniform case management report or various fast-track deadlines for the case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/5/2024. (MEJ)
|
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by March 11, 2024, file a completed uniform Case Management Report. The Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery in the vast majority of cases. If the parties believe that more than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. After the Case Management Report is filed, the Court will determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/5/2024. (DMD)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MEJ) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER of service returned executed on 1/4/2024 by Derek Tyrone Anderson as to Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. (Printy, Gary) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and US Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams. New case number: 8:24-cv-00045-VMC-NHA. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams. (AM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Derek Tyrone Anderson. (Printy, Gary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation with Jury Demand filed by Derek Tyrone Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Printy, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Anderson v. Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Derek Tyrone Anderson | |
| Represented By: | Gary L. Printy, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Tori Simmons |
| Represented By: | Fred Conwell Marshall, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
