Moore v. Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation
| Maurice Moore |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation |
| 8:2024cv00052 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Mary S Scriven |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to Transfer Under Local Rule 1.07(a) by Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. (Simmons, Tori) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 1/11/2024. (KBP)
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Corporate Parent Cognizant Domestic Holdings Corporation for Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. Related case(s): Yes (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Tori Simmons on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. Lead Counsel: Tori C. Simmons. (Simmons, Tori) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Maurice Moore. (Printy, Gary) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Maurice Moore. Related case(s): Yes (Printy, Gary) |
| Filing 5 Entered in Error (KME). |
| Filing 4 WAIVER of service returned executed on 1/4/2024 by Maurice Moore as to Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. (Printy, Gary) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:24-cv-52-KKM-AEP. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. (ARC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Maurice Moore. (Printy, Gary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation with Jury Demand filed by Maurice Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Printy, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moore v. Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maurice Moore | |
| Represented By: | Gary L. Printy, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Tori Simmons |
| Represented By: | Dennis Parker Waggoner |
| Represented By: | Fred Conwell Marshall, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
