Lawton v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Marqus A. Lawton |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2024cv00194 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel and Designation of Lead Counsel. Ellen Veronica Abt substituting for Nadine DeLuca Elder. (Abt, Ellen) Modified text on 1/29/2024 (BD). |
| Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:24-cv-194-MSS-AEP. (RLK) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Marqus A. Lawton. Related case(s): No (Escarraz, Enrique) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Marqus A. Lawton. (Escarraz, Enrique) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Enrique Escarraz, III on behalf of Marqus A. Lawton. Lead Counsel: Enrique Escarraz, III. (Escarraz, Enrique) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21681842). The plaintiff declines consent to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Marqus A. Lawton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Escarraz, Enrique) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
