Rodriguez v. DI ST Petersburg LLC
| Benicio Rodriguez |
| DI ST Petersburg LLC |
| Stacy Estes Yates |
| 8:2024cv00233 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to DI ST Petersburg LLC. (ABC) |
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Motion for Clerk's Default. The Clerk is directed to enter default against DI ST Petersburg, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 3/13/2024. (CES)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Clerk's Default against DI ST Petersburg LLC by Benicio Rodriguez. (Kroboth, Andres) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 10 RETURN of service executed on 2/1/2024 by Benicio Rodriguez as to DI ST Petersburg LLC. (Storch, Noah) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Benicio Rodriguez. (Kroboth, Andres) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Benicio Rodriguez. Related case(s): No (Kroboth, Andres) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Andres Kroboth on behalf of Benicio Rodriguez. Lead Counsel: Andres Kroboth. (Kroboth, Andres) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to DI ST Petersburg LLC. (BD) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER appointing Stacy Estes Yates as mediator in this action. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/26/2024. (CCB)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JCG) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JCG) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:24-cv-233-WFJ-AAS. (RLK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DI ST Petersburg LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21695457) filed by Benicio Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Storch, Noah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
