Mickendrow v. Enstar (US) Inc.
Plaintiff: Brian Mickendrow
Defendant: Enstar (US) Inc.
Case Number: 8:2024cv00242
Filed: January 25, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Kathryn Kimball Mizelle
Referring Judge: Christopher P Tuite
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2024 Entered in Error. (AG) Modified on 3/11/2024 (AG).
March 8, 2024 Acknowledgment - Transferred case has been opened in the District of Massachusetts as case 1:24-cv-10586, filed 03/07/2024. (JNB)
February 26, 2024 Filing 14 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION panel order transferring case to: District of Massachusetts. MDL case number: 3083. (JNB)
February 8, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Brian Mickendrow. Related case(s): Yes (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
February 7, 2024 Filing 12 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Brian Mickendrow. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
February 7, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Jeffrey M. Ostrow on behalf of Brian Mickendrow. Lead Counsel: Jeff Ostrow. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
February 6, 2024 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #7 Standing Order by Enstar (US) Inc.. (Tiblier, Christian)
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER granting Defendant's #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. Defendant must respond to the Complaint, (Doc. 1-1), by March 4, 2024. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 1/29/2024. (ZG)
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER: Defendant's #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement fails to meet the standards this Court requires to effectively screen cases for potential conflicts. The Court requires parties to disclose "ownership however small of a party's shares or stock," not simply those whose ownership constitutes 10% or more. See (Doc. #7) at 7. Defendant must file a new statement using the form attached to the #7 Civil Case Order (also available on the undersigned's website) by February 2, 2024. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 1/29/2024. (ZG)
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CIVIL CASE STANDING ORDER. The Parties shall meet and file a Case Management Report using the standard form on the Court's website within forty days after removal. Each Party must also file a Corporate Disclosure Statement using the standard template attached to this Order (also available on the undersigned's website under the "forms" tab) within fourteen days. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 1/29/2024. (ZG)
January 26, 2024 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Enstar (US) Inc.. (Tiblier, Christian)
January 26, 2024 Filing 5 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Enstar (US) Inc.. (Mercado Robles, Yameel)
January 26, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL All Counsel of Record of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JOS)
January 26, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Amina A. Thoma, Andrew E. Mize, Samuel J. Strauss, Raina Borelli Local Rule 2.01(c), Special Admission of Non-Resident Lawyer - File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Co-counsel with filing rights may electronically file the motion on behalf of the non-resident lawyer or the motion may be filed on paper; Pay the Special Admission Fee; Submit a Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration through PACER. Visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers for details (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JOS)
January 25, 2024 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:24-cv-242-KKM-CPT. (JCG)
January 25, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pinellas County Circuit Court, case number 24-000045-CI filed in State Court on January 4, 2024. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-21697805 filed by Enstar (US) Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit Disclosure Statement)(Mercado Robles, Yameel) COUNSEL NOTIFIED TO REFILE EXHIBIT 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AS A SEPARATE ENTRY Modified on 1/26/2024 (JOS).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mickendrow v. Enstar (US) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Mickendrow
Represented By: Amina A. Thomas
Represented By: Andrew E Mize
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Ostrow
Represented By: Jonathan M. Streisfeld
Represented By: Samuel J Strauss
Represented By: Steven Sukert
Represented By: Raina Borelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Enstar (US) Inc.
Represented By: Christian H Tiblier
Represented By: Yameel L. Mercado Robles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?