Twomey v. American Textile Company Incorporated
Dawn Twomey |
American Textile Company Incorporated |
8:2024cv00264 |
January 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sean P Flynn |
Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff #8 voluntarily dismisses this action under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Fed. R. Civ. P. Because no Defendant answers or moves for summary judgment, the notice of voluntary dismissal is self-executing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Matthews v. Gaither, 902 F.2d 877, 880 (11th Cir. 1990). The Clerk is directed to terminate any deadlines and pending motions, and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 2/28/2024. (ZG) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal by Dawn Twomey (Wright, William) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Dawn Twomey. (Wright, William) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Dawn Twomey. Related case(s): No (Wright, William) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to American Textile Company Incorporated. (ARL) |
Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to establish--no later than February 23, 2024, and in a brief no longer than ten pages--why the Court should not dismiss Plaintiff's class allegations for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act. Specifically, Plaintiff should explain why this action satisfies the Class Action Fairness Act's $5,000,000 jurisdictional threshold. 28 U.S.C. 1332(d)(2). Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 1/29/2024. (ZG) |
Filing 3 CIVIL CASE STANDING ORDER. The Parties shall meet and file a Case Management Report using the standard form on the Court's website within forty days after any Defendant appears. Each Party must also file a Corporate Disclosure Statement using the standard template attached to this Order (also available on the undersigned's website under the "forms" tab) within fourteen days after appearing. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 1/29/2024. (ZG) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:24-cv-264-KKM-SPF. (JCG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Textile Company Incorporated with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21707731) filed by Dawn Twomey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Lead Counsel Designation)(Wright, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Twomey v. American Textile Company Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dawn Twomey | |
Represented By: | William Charles Wright |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: American Textile Company Incorporated | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.