DeAngelis v. Commissioner of Social Security
Thomas James DeAngelis |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
8:2024cv00419 |
February 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Nicholas P Mizell |
Christopher P Tuite |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 4/4/2024. (WRW) |
Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 8:24-cv-419-NPM. Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite no longer assigned to the case. (NAS) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Thomas James DeAngelis. Related case(s): Yes (Avard, Carol) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Carol Ann Avard on behalf of Thomas James DeAngelis. Lead Counsel: Carol Avard. (Avard, Carol) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Thomas James DeAngelis. (Avard, Carol) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:24-cv-00419-CPT. (JG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21771819). The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Thomas James DeAngelis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Avard, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.