Soderman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Richard Soderman
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 8:2024cv00430
Filed: February 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Julie S Sneed
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2024 Filing 12 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings by Commissioner of Social Security. (Thorp, Whitney)
March 5, 2024 Filing 11 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Unassigned Magistrate. New case number: 8:24-cv-00430-UAM. Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed no longer assigned to the case. (SAO)
February 23, 2024 Filing 10 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Richard Soderman. (Steinberg, Michael)
February 23, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Richard Soderman. Related case(s): No (Steinberg, Michael)
February 23, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Michael Alan Steinberg on behalf of Richard Soderman. Lead Counsel: Michael A. Steinberg. (Steinberg, Michael)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on February 20, 2024. (DAD)
February 20, 2024 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Commissioner of Social Security. (Thorp, Whitney)
February 20, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Commissioner of Social Security. Related case(s): No (Thorp, Whitney)
February 20, 2024 Filing 4 Notice of substitution of AUSA. Whitney Livengood Thorp substituting for Nadine DeLuca Elder. (Thorp, Whitney)
February 16, 2024 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:23-cv-430-JSS. (RLK)
February 16, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Richard Soderman. (Steinberg, Michael)
February 16, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Richard Soderman. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Steinberg, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Soderman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Soderman
Represented By: Michael Alan Steinberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John F. Rudy, III
Represented By: Nadine DeLuca Elder
Represented By: Whitney Livengood Thorp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?