Cement Industries, Inc. v. Barr & Barr, Inc. et al
| Cement Industries, Inc. |
| BARR & BARR, INC. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| 8:2024cv00553 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary Rhodes on behalf of Cement Industries, Inc. (Rhodes, Gary) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Gary Rhodes and Scott Atwood of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ARL) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:24-cv-553-JSM-AAS. (ARL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BARR & BARR, INC., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21825158) filed by Cement Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A- F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, #4 Proposed Summons BARR & BARR, INC.)(Rhodes, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
