Cement Industries, Inc. v. Barr & Barr, Inc. et al
| Cement Industries, Inc. |
| BARR & BARR, INC. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| 8:2024cv00553 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint , Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Barr & Barr, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Norris, Bruce) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KAC) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to file promptly a Notice of a Related Action identifying and describing any related action either pending or closed in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KAC) |
|
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Barr & Barr, Inc. (Norris, Bruce) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Barr & Barr, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (KME) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary Rhodes on behalf of Cement Industries, Inc. (Rhodes, Gary) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Gary Rhodes and Scott Atwood of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ARL) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:24-cv-553-JSM-AAS. (ARL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Barr & Barr, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21825158) filed by Cement Industries, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A- F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, #4 Proposed Summons Barr & Barr, Inc.)(Rhodes, Gary) Modified text on 3/4/2024 (KME). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.