Outlaw v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
| Jarrish K. Outlaw |
| Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida, Second District Court of Appeals and 13th Judicial Circuit Court |
| 8:2024cv00555 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER dismissing Outlaw's federal civil rights complaint with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 3/11/2024. (JT)
|
| Filing 3 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:24-cv-00555-MSS-AAS. Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed no longer assigned to the case. Motion REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis/Affidavit of Indigency. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. (SAO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Jarrish K. Outlaw. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Attorney General, State of Florida, Second District Court of Appeals, Secretary, Department of Corrections filed by Jarrish K. Outlaw. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
