Morrison v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
Prichelle Morrison |
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and John Doe |
8:2024cv00646 |
March 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Natalie Hirt Adams |
Mary S Scriven |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ELM) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams. New case number: 8:24-cv-646-MSS-NHA. (ARL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 13th Judicial Circuit, case number 23-CA-017025 filed in State Court on 12/05/2023. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-21858906 filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 State Court COMPLAINT, #9 State Court ANSWER, #10 State Court Docket Sheet, #11 State Court Other Documents, #12 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.