Chambers v. Commissioner of Social Security
Jerome Chambers |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
8:2024cv00649 |
March 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
William F Jung |
Anthony E Porcelli |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 3/12/2024. (SEC) |
Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:24-cv-649-WFJ-AEP. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. (ARL) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Jerome Chambers. (Atkins, Sarah) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Sarah Elizabeth Atkins on behalf of Jerome Chambers. Lead Counsel: Sarah Atkins. (Atkins, Sarah) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jerome Chambers. (Atkins, Sarah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Commissioner. The plaintiff declines consent to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Jerome Chambers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Atkins, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.