Chaudhry v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
| Shawn Dean Chaudhry |
| Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union LLC and Truist Bank |
| 8:2024cv00674 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Octavio Gomez and Frank Kerney of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ARL) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:24-cv-674-MSS-AEP. (ARL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21875507) filed by Shawn Dean Chaudhry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons as to Equifax, #3 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons as to Experian, #4 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons as to Trans Union, #5 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons as to Truist)(Kerney, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
