New Muslim Party et al v. State of Florida et al
New Muslim Party and Jermel Arcilicia Taylor |
State of Florida and City of Miami |
8:2024cv00895 |
April 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Natalie Hirt Adams |
William F Jung |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Acknowledgment - Transferred case has been opened in the Southern District of Florida as case 1:24-cv-21444, filed 04/18/2024. (JNB) |
Filing 4 CASE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division. (JNB) |
Filing 3 ORDER transferring this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, for all further proceedings. The Clerk shall forward the file to the Miami Division of the Southern District of Florida and CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 4/17/2024. (MWC) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Jermel Arcilicia Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Miami, State of Florida filed by New Muslim Party, Jermel Arcilicia Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.