Davis-Bernard v. Global Lending Services, LLC et al
| EUGENIA DAVIS-BERNARD |
| Global Lending Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC and Trans Union LLC |
| 8:2024cv00994 |
| April 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:24-cv-994-KKM-SPF. (TNP) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by EUGENIA DAVIS-BERNARD. (Cok, Christian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by EUGENIA DAVIS-BERNARD. Related case(s): No (Cok, Christian) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Christian Earl Cok on behalf of EUGENIA DAVIS-BERNARD. Lead Counsel: Christian E. Cok. (Cok, Christian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22018341) filed by EUGENIA DAVIS-BERNARD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons)(Cok, Christian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
