Washington v. Clarity Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Keneisha Washington
Defendant: Clarity Services, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2024cv01682
Filed: July 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Thomas P Barber
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2024 Filing 20 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MCB)
September 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ENDORSED ORDER: On the basis of Plaintiff's "Notice of Settlement" (Doc. #18), this cause is hereby dismissed without prejudice, subject to the right of the parties within 60 days of the date hereof to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, a request for an extension of time, or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that 60 day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 9/13/2024. (ANL)
September 13, 2024 Filing 18 NOTICE of settlement by Keneisha Washington (Geiger, Bryan)
September 10, 2024 Filing 17 Minute Entry. Virtual Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone: IDEAL STATUS CONFERENCE held on 9/10/2024. (DIGITAL) (JS)
September 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER setting IDEAL Program deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 9/10/2024. (BEE)
September 4, 2024 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Christian Earl Cok on behalf of Keneisha Washington (Cok, Christian)
August 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ENDORSED ORDER setting IDEAL conference. Video conference set for 9/10/2024 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. The court will send counsel a calendar entry containing a link to the videoconference information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 8/19/2024. (BEE)
August 16, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Order Referring Case to U.S. Magistrate Judge for IDEAL Program. See attached Order for important deadlines and information about the IDEAL Program. (JS)
August 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ENDORSED ORDER: "Defendant Clarity Services, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint" (Doc. #8) is granted. Defendant may file its response to the complaint on or before September 13, 2024. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 8/12/2024. (ANL)
August 12, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Clarity Services, Inc.. Related case(s): No (Ruiz, Maria)
August 12, 2024 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Clarity Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc for Clarity Services, Inc.. (Ruiz, Maria)
August 12, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Maria Helena Ruiz on behalf of Clarity Services, Inc.. Lead Counsel: Maria H. Ruiz. (Ruiz, Maria)
August 12, 2024 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Clarity Services, Inc.. (Ruiz, Maria)
July 30, 2024 Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on July 25, 2024 by Keneisha Washington as to Clarity Services, Inc.. (Geiger, Bryan)
July 17, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Clarity Services, Inc. (JDR) Modified docket text on 7/18/2024 (JOS).
July 17, 2024 Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:24-cv-01682-TPB-AAS. (JOS)
July 17, 2024 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Keneisha Washington. (Geiger, Bryan)
July 17, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Keneisha Washington. Related case(s): No (Geiger, Bryan)
July 17, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Bryan James Geiger on behalf of Keneisha Washington. Lead Counsel: Bryan J. Geiger. (Geiger, Bryan)
July 17, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clarity Services, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22303001) filed by Keneisha Washington. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Geiger, Bryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. Clarity Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clarity Services, Inc.
Represented By: Maria Helena Ruiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keneisha Washington
Represented By: Bryan James Geiger
Represented By: Christian Earl Cok
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?