Bey v. DHL et al
| Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey |
| Lady Luck Logistics LLC, Alexander Wynendts, Deutsche Post, Anthony Urso, Deutsche Bank, DHL, John Doe, Jan Duscheck, Bernd Rose, John Alexander, Manja Eifert, Ken Allen, Manreu Clark, Detlef Polaschete, Dr. Dagmer Valcoarcal, Gabreu Platscher, Stefan Viertel, Mike Parra, Yngve Slyngsta, Timo Keider, Ludgwig Blomeyer-Bartenstein, Michele Trogni, Martina Klaf and Signman Gabriel |
| 8:2024cv01704 |
| July 19, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to USCA consisting of copies of notice of appeal, docket sheet, order/judgment being appealed, and motion, if applicable to USCA re #14 Notice of Appeal. (AA) |
Filing 16
ENDORSED ORDER denying #15 Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. The Court found the action frivolous and certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 9/5/2024. (CCB)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (AA) (e-portal) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 12 Order Dismissing Case as Frivolous, by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. Filing fee not paid. (AA) (e-portal) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KME) |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER DISMISSING AND CLOSING CASE: The case is dismissed as frivolous and not amenable to cure, hence the dismissal is with prejudice - no further filings will be entertained. Refer to Dkt. 8 above, where the Court cautioned Plaintiff that reliance on a Moorish documents theory would prove problematic for any amended claim. The amended complaint is unclear and at time is entirely incomprehensible. But Plaintiff ra nu ra khuti amen bey sues DHL and a trucking company and various of its employees. The amended complaint is asserted under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (Dkt 9 at 0), seeking $3 million in damages. Plaintiff bey seeks "a permanent injunction preventing the defendants from engaging in policies and practices that discriminate against Moors and other nationalities seeking to exercise their right to work without being required to deny their heritage and forced into involuntary servitude." Dkt. 9 at 10. The gravamen of the amended complaint, as also stated in the original complaint, was that in the DHL hiring process Plaintiff apparently presented as identification (and for Form I-9 purposes) a Moorish indigenous identification card. Plaintiff identifies this as an "Allodial National Identification card" (Dkt. 6 at 5) and an "Aboriginal National Identification Card" (Dkt. 9 at 8). The national origin that Plaintiff claims is "United Washitaw De Dugdahmoundyah Muur [sic, likely Moor] Nation". Dkt. 9 at 2. Plaintiff states that the refusal to recognize this card is actionable on several grounds, including constituting national origin discrimination in hiring in violation of Title VII. He protests that DHL and the trucking company suggested he get a driver's license or state identification card to complete the hiring-on process. Plaintiff asserts that he is injured by failure to recognize his national origin and his indigenous identification documents. He avers he is not African American or related terms. Dkt. 9 at 10. The refusal of an employer to honor an "indigenous Moorish" "Allodial National Identification card" is not actionable and such a claim is without merit in fact and law, ie. frivolous. The Court undertakes a general review of its docket and screening per 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 8/29/2024. (Jung, William) Modified on 8/29/2024 (Jung, William).
|
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER terminating #10 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 8/29/2024. (Jung, William)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (AG) (e-portal) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. Modified text on 8/20/2024 (AG). |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against DHL, Deutsche Bank, Deutsche Post, Lady Luck Logistics LLC, Anthony Urso, Alexander Wynendts, Bernd Rose, Detlef Polaschete, Dagmer Valcoarcal, Gabreu Platscher, Jan Duscheck, John Alexander, Ken Allen, Ludgwig Blomeyer-Bartenstein, Manja Eifert, Manreu Clark, Martina Klaf, Michele Trogni, Mike Parra, Signman Gabriel, Stefan Viertel, Timo Keider, Yngve Slyngsta, John Doe with Jury Demand. filed by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AG) (e-portal) Modified text on 8/20/2024 (AG). |
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER dismissing case. The case fails to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The case sets forth an attempted hire-on by Plaintiff at a local trucking/logistics company. It appears to assert a claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against a non-governmental defendant. Generally such a defendant must have been acting under color of state law. However, the complaint is unclear as to this matter. In any event the Plaintiff appears to have given I-9 documents as part of the onboarding process, but may have only provided one I-9 compliant document. Plaintiff is cautioned that reliance on Moorish documents or law is unlikely to provide success under prevailing U.S. and Florida law. The complaint is not clear as to this point. It also notes and attaches an EEOC letter but fails to attempt to state a violation of Title VII or suggest a proper cause of action for employment discrimination. Plaintiff is respectfully urged to consult legal counsel, perhaps one like Bay Area Legal Services, who might provide legal representation or advice for free, (800) 625-2257. These are helpful people who care about their clients. Plaintiff may refile an amended complaint but is cautioned that the present one does not come close to stating a proper cause of action. Likewise, if an amended complaint is filed Plaintiff should refile an in forma pauperis affidavit using the Clerk's form (and provide full, truthful detain for the Clerk). These corrective measures must be accomplished within 21 days, in default of which the Court will close this file permanently. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 7/29/2024. (Jung, William) Modified on 7/29/2024 (Jung, William).
|
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 7/29/2024. (Jung, William)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to file using Using Electronic Court Filing System (ECF) by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (AA) (e-portal) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JCG) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to file promptly a Notice of a Related Action identifying and describing any related action either pending or closed in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JCG) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE disclosure statement by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (MCB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (MCB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(MCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
