Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. v. Customized Distribution, LLC
| Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. |
| Customized Distribution, LLC |
| 8:2024cv02255 |
| September 24, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER: The plaintiff's motion (Doc. #10) to cancel the preliminary injunction hearing set for October 10, 2024, is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/7/2024. (JTM)
|
| Filing 11 WAIVER of service returned executed on 10/07/2024 by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. as to Customized Distribution, LLC. (Isani, Jamie) |
| Filing 10 Time Sensitive MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to cancel preliminary injunction hearing set for October 10, 2024 and Notice of Withdrawal of Request for Preliminary Injunction by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.. (Isani, Jamie) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF HEARING Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 10/10/2024 at 01:30 PM in Tampa Courtroom 15 A before Judge Steven D. Merryday. (DAY) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting-in-part and denying-in-part #3--motion for temporary restraining order and requesting a preliminary injunction hearing; granting #5-- motion to seal; directing the clerk to seal the items listed in the order (This document is sealed and only available to the Court). Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/2/2024. (JTM)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c) and Local Rule 3.02(a)(2). -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to file promptly a Notice of a Related Action identifying and describing any related action either pending or closed in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (DAY) |
| Filing 6 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Steven D. Merryday and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:24-cv-2255-SDM-SPF. (AA) |
| Filing 5 Time Sensitive Unopposed MOTION to file MOTION under seal by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Stephen A. Messer In support of Plaintiffs Motion to Seal, #2 Proposed Sealed Item Complaint, #3 Proposed Sealed Item Emergency Motion (Ex Parte) for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injuctive Relief and Memorandum of Law)(Isani, Jamie). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. re #3 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (Ex Parte) And Preliminary Injuctive Relief and Memorandum of Law of Filing of Proposed Order (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order)(Isani, Jamie) |
| Filing 3 Ex Parte Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order And Preliminary Injuctive Relief and Memorandum of Law by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A- Declaration of Christopher Ward, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B- Declaration of Stephen Messer)(Isani, Jamie) Modified text to add ex parte seal on 9/25/2024 (LSS). |
| REFUND for duplicate payment. Receipt number AFLMDC-22555108 refunded in the amount of $ $405.00 paid to Jamie Zysk Isani.. (NLC) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT Preliminary Injuctived Relief Requested against All Defendants (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22555123) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Isani, Jamie) Modified text on 9/25/2024 (MCB). |
| Filing 1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Checkers Holdings, Inc, Other Affiliate Burger BossCo Intermediate, Inc. for Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc... (Isani, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. v. Customized Distribution, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Natalia Cristina San Juan |
| Represented By: | Jamie Zysk Isani |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Customized Distribution, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
