Thorpe v. Watson Clinic, LLP
| David Thorpe |
| Watson Clinic, LLP |
| 8:2024cv02359 |
| October 11, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ENDORSED ORDER granting #16 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Gary M. Klinger may appear pro hac vice, subject to the requirement that counsel submit their Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration (see https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers) within seven days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 11/12/2024. (BEE)
|
| Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Gary M. Klinger to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-22706602 for $150 by David Thorpe. (Klinger, Gary) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Andrew John Shamis on behalf of David Thorpe. Lead Counsel: Andrew J. Shamis. (Shamis, Andrew) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Andrew John Shamis of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (GL) |
| Filing 13 RETURN of service executed on 10/23/2024 by David Thorpe as to Watson Clinic, LLP. (Shamis, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Watson Clinic, LLP of Motion Filed in Case 8:24-cv- 02157-SDM-LSG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Joint Motion For Consolidation of Related Cases and Second Extension of Time)(Saikali, Alfred) Modified text on 11/8/2024 (GL). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Watson Clinic, LLP. Related case(s): Yes (Saikali, Alfred) |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Watson Clinic, LLP. (Saikali, Alfred) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer A. McLoone on behalf of Watson Clinic, LLP (McLoone, Jennifer) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Alfred John Saikali on behalf of Watson Clinic, LLP. Lead Counsel: Alfred J. Saikali. (Saikali, Alfred) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Alfred John Saikali on behalf of Watson Clinic, LLP (Saikali, Alfred) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by David Thorpe. Related case(s): Yes (Shamis, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by David Thorpe. (Shamis, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to file promptly a Notice of a Related Action identifying and describing any related action either pending or closed in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (DAY) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Watson Clinic, LLP. (JTM) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Steven D. Merryday and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:24-cv-2359-SDM-AAS. (AA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Watson Clinic, LLP with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22606298) filed by David Thorpe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Data Breach, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Shamis, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thorpe v. Watson Clinic, LLP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Thorpe | |
| Represented By: | Gary M. Klinger |
| Represented By: | Andrew John Shamis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Watson Clinic, LLP | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer A. McLoone |
| Represented By: | Alfred John Saikali |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
