Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Juan Garcia |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2024cv02410 |
| October 18, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part 2 of 2)(King, Katauna) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Katauna King on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. Lead Counsel: Katauna J. King. (King, Katauna) |
| Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:24-cv-02410-AAS. (AA) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Sarah Patience Jacobs on behalf of Juan Garcia. Lead Counsel: Sarah P. Jacobs. (Jacobs, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Patience Jacobs on behalf of Juan Garcia (Jacobs, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22625095). The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Juan Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Culbertson, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
