Nguyen v. Tampa Karaoke VIP, Inc.
Plaintiff: BRIAN NGUYEN
Defendant: Tampa Karaoke VIP, Inc.
Pretrial Services: Carlos J. Burruezo
Case Number: 8:2025cv00050
Filed: January 8, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Natalie Hirt Adams
Referring Judge: Virginia M Hernandez Covington
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a notice of case settlement, indicating that a settlement has been reached in this case. (Doc. #13). The Court notes that, in the Eleventh Circuit, any settlement reached between the parties in an FLSA action is subject to judicial scrutiny of the terms of the settlement agreement. See Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, the parties shall file their motion for Court approval of the settlement agreement by March 17, 2025. The parties should include information concerning the amount to be paid to Plaintiff (including liquidated damages), the payment of Plaintiff's attorney's fees, and whether the issue of attorney's fees was negotiated separately from the amount to be paid to Plaintiff for alleged FLSA violations. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 3/4/2025. (MG)
March 3, 2025 Filing 13 NOTICE of settlement by Brian Nguyen (Lee, Kyle)
February 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying without prejudice #11 Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams on 2/25/2025.(RAP)
February 21, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default against Tampa Karaoke VIP, Inc. by Brian Nguyen. (Lee, Kyle) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams.
February 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER: Defendant's answer was due February 18, 2025. (Doc. # 8). Yet, no answer has been filed. And Plaintiff has not promptly applied to the Clerk for entry of Clerk's default. Accordingly, the Court urges Plaintiff to promptly apply to the Clerk for entry of default. See Local Rule 1.10(b) & (d). Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 2/20/2025. (DMD)
January 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are directed to adhere to the Court's Scheduling Order. This action is hereby referred to Carlos Burruezo, Esq., for mediation. The parties must mediate no later than April 18, 2025. Lead Counsel shall file a notice of mediation informing the Court as to the date, time, and location of mediation by March 3, 2025. Neither party may reschedule or cancel the mediation conference once it is set; leave of Court must be obtained before the mediation conference may be rescheduled or cancelled. The parties shall not mediate until the information exchange outlined in the Scheduling Order is completed. Absent compelling circumstances and leave of Court, lead counsel must appear at the mediation conference. Lead Counsel shall file a notice informing the Court as to the results of mediation within 24 hours of the mediation conference. In the event mediation results in an impasse, the parties must file their jointly-prepared fast-track case management report within 24 hours of the mediation conference. Upon review of the jointly-prepared case management report, the Court will determine whether a case management hearing is necessary. If a case management hearing is necessitated, the Court will set the hearing by separate notice. Furthermore, if mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/28/2025. (MEJ)
January 28, 2025 Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on January 25, 2025 by Brian Nguyen as to Tampa Karaoke VIP, Inc. (Lee, Kyle) Modified text on 1/28/2025 (MCB).
January 10, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JCG)
January 10, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to file promptly a Notice of a Related Action identifying and describing any related action either pending or closed in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JCG)
January 10, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Kyle James Lee on behalf of Brian Nguyen. Lead Counsel: Kyle J. Lee. (Lee, Kyle)
January 10, 2025 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Tampa Karaoke VIP, Inc. (AM)
January 10, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Kyle James Lee of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AM)
January 9, 2025 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams. New case number: 8:25-cv-00050-VHC-NHA. (JOS)
January 8, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tampa Karaoke VIP, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22891718) filed by Brian Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Lee, Kyle) Modified text on 1/10/2025 (AM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nguyen v. Tampa Karaoke VIP, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRIAN NGUYEN
Represented By: Kyle James Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tampa Karaoke VIP, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Pretrial services: Carlos J. Burruezo
Represented By: Carlos J. Burruezo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?