Kerney, III v. Certified Credit Reporting of Florida, Inc. et al
| Frank Howard Kerney, III |
| LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. and Certified Credit Reporting of FLorida, Inc. |
| 8:2025cv00118 |
| January 15, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #13 Defendant Certified Credit Reporting of Florida, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Defendant Certified Credit Reporting of Florida, Inc. shall have up to and including March 25, 2025 to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 3/14/2025. (DEJ)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Certified Credit Reporting of Florida, Inc.. (Litchfield, Molly) |
| Filing 12 RETURN of service executed on January 28, 2025 by Frank Howard Kerney, III as to Certified Credit Reporting of Florida, Inc. (Marchiando, Craig) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of hearing: Case Management Conference set for 3/27/2025 at 10:00 AM VIA ZOOM before Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. (LV) |
|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #9 Defendant LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc. shall have up to and including March 20, 2025 to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 2/14/2025. (DEJ)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.. (Adams, Eric) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on January 28, 2025 by Frank Howard Kerney, III as to LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.. (Marchiando, Craig) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Craig C. Marchiando on behalf of Frank Howard Kerney, III. Lead Counsel: Craig C. Marchiando. (Marchiando, Craig) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Certified Credit Reporting of Florida, Inc., LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. (MSN) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Craig C. Marchiando of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MSN) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Order Referring Case to U.S. Magistrate Judge for IDEAL Program. See attached Order for important deadlines and information about the IDEAL Program. (LV) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:25-cv-118-MSS-AEP. (RLK) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Frank Howard Kerney, III. (Marchiando, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Certified Credit Reporting of FLorida, Inc., LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-22914367) filed by Frank Howard Kerney, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons Certified Credit Reporting of Florida, Inc.)(Marchiando, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
