Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Christina Smith |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2025cv00423 |
| February 20, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Notice of substitution of AUSA. Eric B Tucker substituting for Nadine DeLuca Elder. (Tucker, Eric) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 2/24/2025. (CPK)
|
| Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:25-cv-423-AEP. (ARL) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Jason Daniel Quick on behalf of Christina Smith. Lead Counsel: Jason Quick. (Quick, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Christina Smith. (Quick, Jason) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Christina Smith. (Quick, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Christina Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Quick, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.