Golden v. Ragsdale et al
| Jeremy David Golden |
| Sergeant Ragsdale, Sergeant Townsend, Hardee Correctional Institution and Florida Department of Corrections |
| 8:2025cv00430 |
| February 20, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER reassigning this case to the Honorable Katheryn K. Mizelle for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 1.07(a)(2)(A). See 8:24-cv-1815-KKM-NHA. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 4/8/2025. (RO)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or complete and return the Prisoner Consent and Financial Certificate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 3/11/2025. (TDC)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jeremy David Golden. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AA) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Florida Department of Corrections, Hardee Correctional Institution, Ragsdale, Townsend Filing fee $405.00, receipt number TPA71798 filed by Jeremy David Golden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Mailing Envelope)(AA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
