Leff et al v. Collins et al
| Susan R. Leff and Roxanne Martz |
| Doug Collins, Elon Musk, Akash Bobba, Edward Coristine, Luke Farritor, Gautier Cole Killian, Gavin Kilger, Ethan Shaotran and Scott Bessent |
| 8:2025cv00725 |
| March 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to this Court's Order, entered May 30, 2025, this action is dismissed without prejudice. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER dismissing action without prejudice because the earlier Order #3 striking the Complaint as a shotgun pleading has now become a final order. See Auto. Alignment & Body Serv., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 953 F.3d 707, 719-22 (11th Cir. 2020) ("Hertz [Corp. v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc., 16 F.3d 1126 (11th Cir. 1994)] establishes that an order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend within a specified time becomes a final judgment if the time allowed for amendment expires without the plaintiff seeking an extension. And when the order becomes a final judgment, the district court loses 'all its prejudgment powers to grant any more extensions' of time to amend the complaint." (citations omitted)). The Clerk is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT, which shall read "This action is dismissed without prejudice," TERMINATE any pending motions and deadlines, and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 5/29/2025. (KMP)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The plaintiffs' #1 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The plaintiffs may file an amended complaint no later April 10, 2025. The #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED as moot. The plaintiffs must pay the $405 filing fee or submit a new motion to proceed in forma pauperis that demonstrates their indigency no later than April 10, 2025. If the plaintiffs fail to file another amended complaint in a timely manner or fail to pay the filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis, this action will become subject to dismissal without further notice. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 3/27/2025. (KMP)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Susan R. Leff. (eportal) (GL) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Susan R. Leff. (eportal)(GL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
