Johnson v. Foye et al
| Edward J. Johnson |
| M. Foye, K. Nelson and GEO RRC / Orlando CCM |
| 8:2025cv00994 |
| April 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT is entered in Defendants' favor. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (ELA) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Johnson's #1 complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Johnson's #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. The CLERK is directed to enter judgment in Defendants' favor and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 4/25/2025. (MLH)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Edward J. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AM) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. Modified text on 4/24/2025 (LNR). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M. Foye, GEO RRC / Orlando CCM, K. Nelson filed by Edward J. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (AM) (Additional document(s) added on 4/23/2025 to replace pdfs with a better image quality: Main document and attachment: Mailing Envelope) (AM). Modified text on 4/23/2025 (AM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.