Neal et al v. Bank of America
Plaintiff: CEO Thomas Neal and CFO Tayrria L. Williams
Defendant: Bank of America
Case Number: 8:2025cv01146
Filed: May 5, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Kathryn Kimball Mizelle
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LNR)
May 28, 2025 Filing 5 JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 5/28/2025. (LNR)
May 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER: A previous order directed the plaintiffs, no later than May 22, 2025, to "explain why this Court has subject matter jurisdiction." (Doc. 2). The plaintiffs were warned that "[f]ailure to comply" would "result in dismissal without prejudice." Id. The plaintiffs failed to comply. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk is directed to enter JUDGMENT, which shall read, "This case is dismissed without prejudice," and to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 5/23/2025. (BTM)
May 20, 2025 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of indigency by Thomas Neal. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (JKB)
May 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ENDORSED ORDER: Since filing their complaint, the plaintiffs have neither paid the required filing fee nor moved to proceed in forma pauperis. No later than May 22, 2025, the plaintiffs must either pay the full $405 filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis. Additionally, the complaint does not identify a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction. No later than May 22, 2025, the plaintiffs must explain why this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 5/8/2025. (BTM)
May 5, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bank of America filed by Thomas Neal, Tayrria L. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (Note: Fee not paid. No IFP motion filed.)(AA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neal et al v. Bank of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CEO Thomas Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CFO Tayrria L. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?