Saunders v. Nardella et al
| Charmaine Saunders |
| Judge Mary Alice Nardella, Judge Brian D. Mize, Chief Judge Daniel Traver, Chief Judge James A. Yancey, Stacey Pectol, John M. Harris, Scott M. Stargel and Jared E. Smith |
| 8:2025cv01361 |
| May 28, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Natalie Hirt Adams |
| William F Jung |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER. On or before November 19, 2025, Plaintiff must either (1) pay the filing fee, or (2) renew her motion to proceed without prepaying the filing fee and file a Second Amended Complaint that complies with the federal rules and this Court's orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams on 10/30/2025. (CJF) (MCB).
|
|
Filing 17
ENDORSED ORDER: Following the Court's dismissal of this action (Dkt. 13), the Clerk's Office docketed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. 16), which it received prior to the dismissal. The Clerk is directed to reopen the case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 10/20/2025. (CCB)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JOS) |
|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER dismissing this case with prejudice for failure to comply with court orders. See #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS at page 8, #9 Order on Report and Recommendations, and 12 Order concerning failure to comply with the prior order. Plaintiff has failed to timely file an amended complaint and either pay the filing fee or file an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 10/15/2025. (CCB)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Charmaine Saunders. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams. |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Brian D. Mize, Mary Alice Nardella, Stacey Pectol, Daniel Traver, James A. Yancey, John M. Harris, Scott M. Stargel, Jared E. Smith Terminating Sixth District Court of Appeals, Keith A. White, John D. Brownlee and Adrian S. Gannam filed by Charmaine Saunders. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Charmaine Saunders. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint and Motion to Proceed ifp on or before October 11, 2025. The deadline will be strictly enforced. If Ms. Saunders does not file the amended complaint and motion to proceed ifp (or pay fee), this case will be dismissed with prejudice and closed without further notice. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 9/11/2025. (CCB)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint, Motion to Proceed Informa Pauperis by Charmaine Saunders. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of change of address by Charmaine Saunders (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; adopting #8 Report and Recommendations. If Ms. Saunders wishes to proceed, she must file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or payment of the filing fee. Should Plaintiff not do so, this case will be dismissed with prejudice and closed without further notice. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 8/21/2025. (CCB)
|
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint and #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams on 8/6/2025. (CJF) |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER denying #6 Motion to Register for CM/ECF Notifications. It does not appear Plaintiff's receipt of CM/ECF notifications is "necessary to avoid unreasonable burdens and to promote access to information." See Hebdon v. Diabetes & Endocrine Ctr. of Fla., P.A., No. 6:22-CV-1879-WWB-DCI, 2023 WL 2186038, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 23, 2023). Plaintiff can access electronic filings by registering online with PACER, and she can search for recent docket activity in her case through the Court's Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feed, which is available at https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rss_outside.pl. Signed by Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams on 6/5/2025. (CJF)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for Permission to Register for CM/ECF Notifications by Charmaine Saunders. (eportal) (GL) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Consent to Receive Electronic Service by Charmaine Saunders. (MCB) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Charmaine Saunders. (MCB) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Charmaine Saunders. (MCB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Charmaine Saunders. (Attachments: #1 Application for IFP)(MCB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Charmaine Saunders. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
