United States of America v. Mottahedeh et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Peymon Mottahedeh, April L. Mottahedeh and April L. Beatty |
| 8:2025cv01728 |
| July 3, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Natalie Hirt Adams |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ENDORSED ORDER granting Plaintiff's #15 Motion to Extend Deadline to Effect Service of Process. The Court finds good cause under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for Plaintiff's requested extension, based on Plaintiff's representations that Defendants appear to wish to evade service and Plaintiff's plans to effect service in January with the assistance of the United States Marshal Service. Plaintiff's deadline to serve Defendants is extended to January 28, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams on 12/23/2025. (NBM)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically Extend Deadline to Effect Service of Process by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Description of Service Attempts on P. Mottahedeh, #2 Exhibit Description of Service Attempts on A. Mottahedeh)(Causey, Daniel) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams.
|
|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen the Case and Extend Deadline to Effect Service (Doc. #13). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to lift the stay and reopen this case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the Court extends the deadline for Plaintiff to serve the Defendants to on or before December 31, 2025. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 11/14/2025. (CAR)
|
|
Case Stay Lifted. (MGB)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION to Reopen Case and Extend Time to Effect Service of Process by United States of America. (Causey, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER. Plaintiff United States of America's Motion to Stay (Doc. #11) is GRANTED. This case is STAYED along with ANY and ALL pending deadlines. On November 13, 2025, and every thirty (30) days thereafter, Plaintiff shall file a status report to inform the Court on the status of the impact of the government shutdown on Plaintiff's ability to proceed forth with this litigation. If a government shutdown no longer impacts Plaintiff's ability to proceed, Plaintiff shall file a motion requesting this Court to reopen the case. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to STAY this matter, place a STAY FLAG on this case, and administratively close the file until further order of the Court. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 10/14/2025. (CAR)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Stay by United States of America. (Causey, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 10
CIVIL Action Order. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 7/8/2025. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to file promptly a Notice of a Related Action identifying and describing any related action either pending or closed in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Daniel B. Causey on behalf of United States of America. Lead Counsel: Daniel B. Causey, IV. (Causey, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL Daniel B. Causey of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (FLY)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS issued as to All Defendants. (FLY)
|
|
Filing 4
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John L. Badalamenti and Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams. New case number: 8:25-cv-1728-JLB-NHA. (EVK)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Related case(s): Yes (Causey, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 2
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Causey, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons to Peymon Mottahedeh, #3 Proposed Summons to April Mottahedeh)(Causey, Daniel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
