Ash v. Dupa et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Ash
Defendant: Matthew Dupa and Allen Temiz
Case Number: 8:2025cv01981
Filed: July 28, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Kathryn Kimball Mizelle
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ABM)
November 12, 2025 Filing 6 JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice ( Signed by Deputy Clerk) (ABM)
November 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENDORSED ORDER: On September 5, 2025, the Magistrate Judge #4 informed Plaintiff that this action would become subject to dismissal without further notice if Plaintiff failed, by October 6, 2025, to amend his #1 complaint and either move again to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. Plaintiff failed to do so. Accordingly, plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to ENTER judgment, which shall read "This case is dismissed without prejudice," terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 11/11/2025. (MLR)
September 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 9/5/2025. (CPK)
August 14, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Christopher Ash. (JOS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
August 1, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ENDORSED ORDER: The plaintiff has failed to pay the $405 filing fee, see https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/fees-table; 28 U.S.C. 1914, or to move to proceed In Forma Pauperis, see 28 U.S.C. 1915. The plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or move to proceed In Forma Pauperis by August 15, 2025, or this action will become subject to dismissal without further notice. See Local Rule 3.10. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 8/1/2025. (SJR)
July 28, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matthew Dupa, Allen Temiz filed by Christopher Ash. Fee not paid, IFP not filed. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (JKB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ash v. Dupa et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Ash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Dupa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allen Temiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?