Doe v. Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC et al
| Amber Doe |
| Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Glaser Weil LLP, Goodwin Procter LLP, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Waymaker LLP, Lenczner Slaght LLP, Nemecek & Cole LLP, Paoli & Purdy LLP, Bisnar Chase LLP, Brown & Charbonneau LLP, Sherman Law, The Law Form Of Rivers J Morrell III, Day Day and Brown, Rivers Morrell, Herb Fox Law, Marriott International, Sheraton Gateway Toronto, Rosewood Hotels, Westin, Fox Corp, MSNBC, Bloomberg, New York Post, Vox Media, New York Magazine, John 1-100 Does and State Actor Defendants |
| 8:2025cv02003 |
| July 30, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AA) |
Filing 5
ENDORSED ORDER: On August 6, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff Amber Doe to renew her application to proceed in forma pauperis on or before August 27, 2025. See (Doc. 3). On August 26, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to show cause as to why the Court should not dismiss the complaint, and her response was due on or before September 9, 2025. See (Doc. #4). To date, Plaintiff has not complied with either order. Consequently, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 9/10/2025. (ANL)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, as to why the Court should not dismiss the complaint and should instead allow her to proceed anonymously in this case. Her written response should not exceed ten pages, not including any exhibits, and should be filed on or before September 9, 2025. Failure to respond as directed may result in the dismissal of the complaint without prejudice without further notice. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 8/26/2025. (ANL)
|
|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form). A review of Plaintiff's application reveals that she used the incorrect form. If Plaintiff elects to renew her application, she shall use the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form), found at the following link: https://www.uscourts.gov/forms/fee-waiver-application-forms/application-proceed-district-court-without-prepaying-fees-or. Plaintiff shall file any renewed application by August 27, 2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 8/6/2025. (MEL)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Amber Doe. (eportal) (MCB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Amber Doe. (eportal) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
