Shaffer v. State of Florida (Hillsborough County)
| Daniel Shaffer |
| State of Florida |
| 8:2025cv02154 |
| August 11, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting Shaffer's #6 motion for clarification. An earlier order #4 dismissed Shaffer's notices of removal without prejudice, remanded this matter to the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida, and directed the Clerk to enter judgment, to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and to close this case. Shaffer seeks clarification of whether the instructions to the Clerk were directed to the Clerk of the federal court or the state court. The instructions in the earlier order #4 were directed only to the Clerk of the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, regarding Middle District Case No. 8:25-cv-2154-KKM-AAS. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 9/11/2025. (MLH)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Clarification re #4 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, by Daniel Shaffer. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to this Court's Order, entered August 20, 2025, this case is dismissed without prejudice. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Shaffer's #1 #2 notices of removal are DISMISSED without prejudice. Shaffer's #3 motion for discharge is DENIED as moot. This matter is REMANDED to the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida. The CLERK is directed to enter judgment, which shall read, "This case is dismissed without prejudice," to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 8/20/2025. (MLH)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically Discharge Case pursuant to Article 1, Section 9 Due Process by Daniel Shaffer. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (JKB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal of Criminal Prosecution by Daniel Shaffer. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (JKB) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/18/2025) (JKB). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State (Titled Notice of Removal) filed by Daniel Shaffer. (No IFP Filed - Filing Fee Not Paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shaffer v. State of Florida (Hillsborough County) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Shaffer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Florida | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
