Sanks v. Brown et al
| Michael Lamont Sanks |
| Christopher Maurice Brown, Mobynn Rihanna Foster and Hillsborough County Sheriff Office |
| 8:2025cv02267 |
| August 25, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Michael Lamont Sanks (AA) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to this Court's Order, entered August 8, 2025, judgment is hereby entered in the Defendant's favor. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
| Filing 3 Sanks's #1 complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Sanks's #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. The CLERK is directed to enter judgment in the Defendants' favor, to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 8/28/2025. (MLH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Michael Lamont Sanks. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (JKB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christopher Maurice Brown, Mobynn Rihanna Foster, Hillsborough County Sheriff Office filed by Michael Lamont Sanks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope) (JKB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
