Rocks-Macqueen v. Paramount Global et al
Plaintiff: Michael Rocks-Macqueen
Defendant: Paramount Global doing business as CBS Studios Inc., Fox Corporation doing business as Fox News and Palantir Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2025cv02513
Filed: September 18, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Natalie Hirt Adams
Referring Judge: Steven D Merryday
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2025 Filing 16 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MSN)
December 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting motions (Docs. #9, #12) to dismiss; denying remaining motions (Docs. #3, #14) as moot. The clerk must close the case. Signed by Senior District Judge Steven D. Merryday on 12/23/2025. (DM)
October 15, 2025 Filing 14 MOTION to Rule on #3 and Notice of Clerical Error by Michael Rocks-Macqueen. (AA)
October 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Michelle Bradford may appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant Palantir Technologies Inc., subject to payment of the $150.00 special admission fee and submission of the Pro Hac Vice E-File Registration (see https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers) within seven days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams on 10/10/2025. (CJF)
October 9, 2025 Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted by Palantir Technologies, Inc.. (Folland, Robert)
October 9, 2025 Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Michelle Bradford to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. BFLMDC-23981009 for $150 by Palantir Technologies, Inc.. (Folland, Robert) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Natalie Hirt Adams.
October 9, 2025 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Fox Corporation. (Parker, Rhett)
October 9, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Fox Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Delaware Division of Corporations - Fox Corporation Filing, #2 Exhibit Arizona 3135 - First Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit Arizona 3290 - Complaint)(Parker, Rhett)
October 9, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Rhett Conlon Parker on behalf of Fox Corporation. Lead Counsel: Rhett C. Parker. (Parker, Rhett)
October 6, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE of Order Referring Case to U.S. Magistrate Judge for IDEAL Program. See attached Order for important deadlines and information about the IDEAL Program. (CDR)
September 22, 2025 Filing 6 RETURN of service executed on 09/19/2025 by Michael Rocks-Macqueen as to Paramount Global. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Proof of Service)(AA)
September 22, 2025 Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on 09/19/2025 by Michael Rocks-Macqueen as to Fox Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Proof of Service)(AA)
September 22, 2025 Filing 4 RETURN of service executed on 09/19/2025 by Michael Rocks-Macqueen as to Palantir Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Proof of Service)(AA)
September 19, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION to file electronically and receive electronic notices and equal access for phone use by Michael Rocks-Macqueen. (AA)
September 18, 2025 Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Fox Corporation, Palantir Technologies, Inc., Paramount Global. (AA)
September 18, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fox Corporation, Palantir Technologies, Inc., Paramount Global with Jury Demand Filing fee $405.00, receipt number TPA72964 filed by Michael Rocks-Macqueen. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(AA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rocks-Macqueen v. Paramount Global et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Rocks-Macqueen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paramount Global doing business as CBS Studios Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fox Corporation doing business as Fox News
Represented By: Chris Bradley Bach
Represented By: Rhett Conlon Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Palantir Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Michelle Bradford
Represented By: Robert Christopher Folland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?