Doby v. Grady Judd et al
| James Douglas Doby, III |
| Sheriff Grady Judd, State Attorney Brian Haas, Attorney General James Uthmeier, Director John Doe and CEO John Doe |
| 8:2025cv02678 |
| October 1, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 USCA COPY of Petition for Writ of Mandamus. USCA number: 26-10784-G. (Received from USCA on 3/13/2026) (MCB) |
Filing 14
ORDER denying #13 Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Senior District Judge Steven D. Merryday on 2/24/2026. (RO)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by James Douglas Doby, III. (LSS) |
| Filing 12 USCA COPY of Petition for Writ of Mandamus. USCA number: 26-10390-G. (MCB) |
| ENTERED IN ERROR (MCB) Modified text on 2/13/2026 (MCB). |
| Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT information form filed by James Douglas Doby, III re #7 Notice of Appeal,. USCA number: 25-14473-G. No transcript(s) requested. (LSS) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #8 Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. See order for further details regarding imposition of the appellate filing fee. Signed by Senior District Judge Steven D. Merryday on 1/16/2026. (RO)
|
| ***11th Circuit Case Number: 25-14473-G for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by James Douglas Doby, III. (MCB) |
| Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of initial appeal package to the U.S. Court of Appeals - 11th Circuit re #7 Notice of Appeal,. In Forma Pauperis Motion filed. (LSS) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by James Douglas Doby, III. (Originally filed with 11th Circuit COA on 12/18/25). (Attachments: #1 Letter from USCA)(LSS) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Judgment, #4 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Order on Motion for Disclosure, by James Douglas Doby, III. Filing fee not paid. ***Case Stayed. (Originally received from 11th Circuit on 11/18/25). (Attachments: #1 Letter from USCA)(LSS) (Main Document 7 replaced on 12/22/2025) (LSS). (Main Document 7 replaced on 12/22/2025) (LSS). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of inquiry by James Douglas Doby, III. Clerk responded with courtesy copy of docket sheet. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to this Court's Order, entered November 26, 2025, judgment is hereby entered dismissing this case. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (BD) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER dismissing #1 complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; denying as moot #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; denying as moot #3 Motion for Disclosure. The clerk must enter a judgment of dismissal against Doby and CLOSE this case. Signed by Senior District Judge Steven D. Merryday on 11/26/2025. (RO)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Disclosure and Discovery by James Douglas Doby, III. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AW) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by James Douglas Doby, III. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AW) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by James Douglas Doby, III. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
