Jackson v. Goostrey et al
| Samuel Jackson |
| Depputy Jordan Goostrey, Deputy Harrison Davis, Deputy Michael Gabot, Deputy Antonio Perez and Sheriff Chad Chronister |
| 8:2025cv02831 |
| October 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Lindsay S Griffin |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of inquiry by Samuel Jackson re #1 Complaint. Clerk responded with courtesy copy of docket sheet. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of inquiry by Samuel Jackson. Clerk responded with courtesy copy of docket sheet. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying Jackson's #2 motion for a preliminary injunction. This action will proceed with screening of Jackson's #1 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 10/23/2025. (JT)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to the Clerk regarding In Forma Pauperis by Samuel Jackson (LSS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Samuel Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Mailing Envelope, #3 Exhibit) (LSS). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chad Chronister, Harrison Davis, Michael Gabot, Jordan Goostrey, Antonio Perez filed by Samuel Jackson. (**No Payment or IFP filed). (Attachments: #1 Appendix A-F, #2 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
