Audet v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Dale Corey Audet |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2025cv02896 |
| October 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ENDORSED ORDER granting #14 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Memorandum of Law. Accordingly, the Court's prior Scheduling Order (#10) is hereby amended as follows: (1) no later than April 22, 2026, Defendant shall file his memorandum; and (2) no later than May 6, 2026, Plaintiff may file his reply brief. All other portions of the Court's prior Scheduling Order (#10) shall remain in full force and effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 3/23/2026. (ACL)
|
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Defendant Commissioner's Brief through April 22, 2026 by Commissioner of Social Security. (Sides, James) |
| Filing 13 PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF in opposition to the Commissioner's decision filed by Dale Corey Audet. (Berger, Erik) |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Plaintiff's Brief. Accordingly, the Court's prior Scheduling Order (#10) is hereby amended as follows: (1) no later than February 19, 2026, Plaintiff shall file his memorandum; (2) no later than March 23, 2026, the Commissioner shall file his memorandum; and (3) no later than April 6, 2026, Plaintiff may file his reply brief. All other portions of the Court's prior Scheduling Order (#10) shall remain in full force and effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 1/14/2026. (ACL)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Plaintiff's Brief - Social Security by Dale Corey Audet. (Berger, Erik) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 12/30/2025. (AMS)
|
| Filing 9 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings by Commissioner of Social Security. (Sides, James) |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Commissioner of Social Security. (Sides, James) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Commissioner of Social Security. Related case(s): No (Sides, James) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by James D. Sides on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. Lead Counsel: James D. Sides. (Sides, James) |
| Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:25-cv-02896-CPT. (LJC) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Dale Corey Audet. Related case(s): No (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Dale Corey Audet. (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Erik William Berger on behalf of Dale Corey Audet. Lead Counsel: Erik W. Berger. (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24034238). The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Dale Corey Audet. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Berger, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
