Ponder v. Wells et al
| Marquise D. Ponder |
| Rick Wells and Deputy Celballow |
| 8:2025cv02988 |
| October 27, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER denying Ponder's #9 motion to reopen this case. When Ponder did not timely submit a fully completed Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate in accordance with the deadline set by the Court, this case was dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court's earlier order. Ponder has not established a basis to reopen this case. This case remains closed. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 3/31/2026. (MLH)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Reopen Case by Marquise D. Ponder. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AW) |
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT entered this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 12/16/2025. (JDR) |
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court's order. The CLERK is directed to enter judgment, which shall read "This case is dismissed without prejudice," to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 12/15/2025. (MLH)
|
| Filing 6 PRISONER consent form and financial certificate by Marquise D. Ponder. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Celballow, Rick Wells Terminating Urubez, Bradenton Police Department and Manatee County Sheriff's Office filed by Marquise D. Ponder. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Marquise D. Ponder. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CRB) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Ponder's #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED without prejudice. Ponder must either pay the $405.00 filing fee or file a fully completed Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate no later than November 24, 2025. The CLERK is directed to SEND Ponder a copy of this order, including attachments. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 11/3/2025. (MLH)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Marquise D. Ponder. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bradenton Police Department, Celballow, Manatee County Sheriff's Office, Urubez, Rick Wells filed by Marquise D. Ponder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.