Pepe v. Pomeroy Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff: PATRIC PEPE
Defendant: Pomeroy Technologies, LLC
Case Number: 8:2025cv03062
Filed: November 6, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Thomas P Barber
Referring Judge: Sean P Flynn
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 23 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 11/10/2026; Dispositive motions due by 12/10/2026; Plaintiff disclosure of expert report due by 9/4/2026; Defendant disclosure of expert report due by 9/4/2026; Rebuttal disclosure of expert report due by 10/9/2026. Pretrial Conference set for APRIL 19, 2027, at 01:30 PM in Tampa Courtroom 14 A before Judge Thomas P. Barber. Trial set for term commencing 5/3/2027 before Judge Thomas P. Barber. The parties anticipate a JURY trial will take 4 days to complete. Conduct mediation hearing by 1/15/2027. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 4/20/2026. (SRC)
April 17, 2026 Filing 22 NOTICE of hearing: Case Management Conference set for OCTOBER 28, 2026, at 01:30 PM in Tampa Courtroom 14 A before Judge Thomas P. Barber. (SRC)
April 15, 2026 Filing 21 Minute Entry. In Person Proceedings held before Judge Thomas P. Barber: INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE held on 4/15/2026. Court Reporter: Rebekah Lockwood (SRC) (Main Document 21 replaced on 4/17/2026) (SRC). Modified on 4/17/2026 to reflect correct counsel present at hearing. (SRC)
April 9, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ENDORSED ORDER: The "Joint Motion to Reschedule Preliminary Pretrial Conference and Request for Remote Conference" (Doc. #19) is hereby denied. If counsel are unable to attend, they may arrange for coverage. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 4/9/2026. (RL)
April 8, 2026 Filing 19 Joint MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically Reschedule preliminary pretrial conference and request for remote conference by All Defendants. (Stephens, Stephen)
March 9, 2026 Filing 18 NOTICE of hearing: Initial Case Management Conference set for APRIL 15, 2026, at 09:30 AM in Tampa Courtroom 14 A before Judge Thomas P. Barber. Parties are advised that should they consent to have this entire case heard by the assigned Magistrate Judge, this hearing will be cancelled, and parties will proceed as directed by the Magistrate Judge. Parties wishing to consent to the Magistrate Judge shall file the attached form on or before the date of this hearing. Failure to appear at the mandatory conference may result in sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the case.(SRC)
March 6, 2026 Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Stephens, Stephen)
March 6, 2026 Filing 16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Pomeroy Technologies, LLC. (Stephens, Stephen)
February 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ENDORSED ORDER granting #14 Unopposed Motion for Special Admission. Attorney S. Joseph Stephens, III, Esq. may appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, counsel shall comply with the electronic filing registration requirement of Local Rule 2.01(c)(5). Signed by Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn on 2/27/2026. (WFM)
February 26, 2026 Filing 14 MOTION for S. Joseph Stephens, III to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-24532047 for $150 by Pomeroy Technologies, LLC. (Tunis, Brenton) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn.
January 26, 2026 Filing 13 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #5 Amended Complaint by Pomeroy Technologies, LLC.(Tunis, Brenton)
December 2, 2025 Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC)
December 2, 2025 Filing 11 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC)
December 2, 2025 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Patric Pepe. (Chanfrau, Kelly)
December 2, 2025 Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Patric Pepe. Related case(s): Yes (Chanfrau, Kelly) Modified on 12/3/2025 to edit docket text. (WLB).
December 2, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Kelly Hagan Chanfrau on behalf of Patric Pepe. Lead Counsel: Kelly H. Chanfrau. (Chanfrau, Kelly)
December 1, 2025 Filing 7 WAIVER of service returned executed on 11/26/2025 by Patric Pepe as to Pomeroy Technologies, LLC. (Chanfrau, Kelly)
November 26, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Kelly Hagan Chanfrau of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LJC)
November 25, 2025 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Pomeroy Technologies, LLC with Jury Demand filed by Patric Pepe.(Chanfrau, Kelly) Modified on 11/26/2025 as to docket text (LJC).
November 7, 2025 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Pomeroy Technologies, LLC. (ARL)
November 7, 2025 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:25-cv-3062-TPB-SPF. (LAW)
November 6, 2025 Filing 2 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Patric Pepe. (Chanfrau, Kelly) Modified on 11/7/2025 to remove capitalization (ARL).
November 6, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pomeroy Technologies, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24091227) filed by Patric Pepe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chanfrau, Kelly) Modified on 11/7/2025 to remove capitalization (ARL).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pepe v. Pomeroy Technologies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PATRIC PEPE
Represented By: Kelly Hagan Chanfrau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pomeroy Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Stephen Joseph Stephens, III
Represented By: Brenton Max Tunis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?