Adams v. Wells Fargo
| Ashley Adams |
| Wells Fargo |
| 8:2025cv03094 |
| November 12, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Lindsay S Griffin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AM) |
Filing 8
ORDER. The Magistrate Judge's Endorsed Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's failure to follow a Court order as detailed in the Endorsed Report. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any pending deadlines and close the file. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 1/16/2026. (BPC)
|
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: A November 14, 2025, order, Doc. 3, required the plaintiff to either file an affidavit supporting her request to proceed without paying the filing fee or to pay the filing fee by November 26, 2025. The plaintiff files no response and no fee has been paid. I recommend dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. 28 U.S.C. 1914(c); Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719, 722 (11th Cir. 1998). A party has fourteen days from the day of service of this report either to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendation or to seek an extension of the fourteen-day deadline. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). Under Eleventh Circuit Rule 3-1, a party failing to object to a magistrate judge's findings or recommendations "waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions." Signed by Magistrate Judge Lindsay S. Griffin on 12/4/2025. (NGB)
|
|
Filing 6
CIVIL Action Order. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 11/18/2025. (KAC)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KAC) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to file promptly a Notice of a Related Action identifying and describing any related action either pending or closed in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KAC) |
|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The plaintiff files no affidavit showing that she is unable to pay, which must occur before waiver of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989); Martinez v. Kristi Kleaners, Inc., 364 F.3d 1305, 1307-08 (11th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, no later than November 26, 2025, the plaintiff must either file an affidavit supporting her request or must pay the filing fee. Failure to do so may result in a recommendation of dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lindsay S. Griffin on 11/14/2025. (Griffin, Lindsay)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ashley Adams. (EGP) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Lindsay S. Griffin. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wells Fargo filed by Ashley Adams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Unpaid Lien, #2 Proposed Summons)(EGP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adams v. Wells Fargo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ashley Adams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wells Fargo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
