Omaghomi v. Hoffman et al
| Curtiss Omaghomi |
| Kurt A. Hoffman, Det. Carlos Verdoni, Det. Sandra Marquez, Inv. Craig Catlin and John Does 1-5 |
| 8:2025cv03206 |
| November 20, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Howard Railey on behalf of Sandra Marquez (Railey, Jonathan) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Kurt A. Hoffman. (Jolly, Gregory) |
Filing 15
ENDORSED ORDER DENYING #11 Defendant Sheriff's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint as MOOT in light of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (Dkt. 12) Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 5/1/2026. (CED)
|
| Filing 14 SUMMONS issued as to Craig Catlin, Kurt A. Hoffman, Sandra Marquez, Carlos Verdoni. (CTR) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Curtiss Omaghomi. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kurt A. Hoffman, Carlos Verdoni, Sandra Marquez, Craig Catlin, John Does 1-5 with Jury Demand. Terminating Unknown deputies (of the Sarasota County Sheriff's office, are sued in their individual capacities for actions taken under color of state law) filed by Curtiss Omaghomi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Kurt A. Hoffman. (Jolly, Gregory) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Gregory James Jolly on behalf of Kurt A. Hoffman. Lead Counsel: Gregory J. Jolly, Esquire. (Jolly, Gregory) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory James Jolly on behalf of Kurt A. Hoffman (Jolly, Gregory) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 3/27/2026 by Curtiss Omaghomi as to Kurt A. Hoffman. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT #4 Report and Recommendation. In light of Plaintiff's having paid the filing fee, the earlier-filed Report and Recommendation is MOOT. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (Dkt. #2), is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 3/27/2026. (CED)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Kurt A. Hoffman. (CTR) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Kurt A. Hoffman. Plaintiff-Curtiss Omaghomi notified via phone on 3/10/2026 to send the completed summons. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
| FEES Paid by Curtiss Omaghomi (Filing fee $405, Receipt Number TPA73847). (EGP) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 1/28/2026. (MTB) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER taking under advisement #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Amended Complaint due by 1/23/26. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 12/19/2025. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Financial Affidavit) (MTB)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Curtiss Omaghomi. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AW) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kurt A. Hoffman, Unknown deputies with Jury Demand filed by Curtiss Omaghomi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(AW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
