Mitchell v. Paddock et al
Plaintiff: Thomas Mitchell
Defendant: Sean T. Paddock and J.E. Dunn Construction Group, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2025cv03219
Filed: November 21, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2025 Filing 16 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (AA)
December 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDERED: This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida. The Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County, Florida. The Clerk is further directed to terminate any pending deadlines and close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/23/2025. (SAA)
December 23, 2025 Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 First MOTION to Dismiss Motion to Dismiss Federal Action and/or Motion to Remand First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by J.E. Dunn Construction Group, Inc., Sean T. Paddock. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit, #2 Exhibit B - Demand)(Richardson, Nicholas)
December 16, 2025 Filing 13 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #11 Order to show cause filed by J.E. Dunn Construction Group, Inc., Sean T. Paddock. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Annual Report, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Sean Paddock, #3 Exhibit C - 5.8.25 Morgan and Morgan Demand Letter to Liberty Insurance)(Richardson, Nicholas)
December 12, 2025 Filing 12 First MOTION to Dismiss Motion to Dismiss Federal Action and/or Motion to Remand , by Thomas Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Driver Exchange, #3 Exhibit C - NOA JE DUNN, #4 Exhibit D - NOA PADDOCK, #5 Exhibit E - Removal, #6 Exhibit F - Demand, #7 Exhibit G - Driver Exchange, #8 Exhibit H - Demand)(Carapella, Leonard) Modified text on 12/15/2025 (BD).
December 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDERED: Defendants are directed to SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court should not remand this action to the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Defendants must file a written response within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the date of this order. Failure to file a written response within the time provided will result in this action being remanded to the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida. Signed by Senior Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/2/2025. (SAA)
November 26, 2025 Filing 10 CORRECTED ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by J.E. Dunn Construction Group, Inc. (Richardson, Nicholas)
November 26, 2025 Filing 9 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Sean T. Paddock. (Richardson, Nicholas)
November 26, 2025 Filing 8 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by J.E. Dunn Construction Group, Inc. (Richardson, Nicholas)
November 25, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Nicholas Edwin Richardson on behalf of J.E. Dunn Construction Group, Inc., Sean T. Paddock. Lead Counsel: Nicholas E. Richardson. (Richardson, Nicholas)
November 25, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Leonard Raymond Carapella on behalf of Thomas Mitchell. Lead Counsel: Leonard Carapella. (Carapella, Leonard)
November 24, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which states, "The first paper filed on behalf of a party must designate only one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action." Counsel must file a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation identifying lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD)
November 24, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CAB)
November 24, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to file promptly a Notice of a Related Action identifying and describing any related action either pending or closed in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement. Counsel must make their disclosures using the standard court form. The Disclosure Statement form can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CAB)
November 21, 2025 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:25-cv-3219-CEH-AEP. (RPB)
November 21, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 6th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County, FL, case number 25-004703-CI filed in State Court on 08/26/2025. Filing fee $405, receipt number AFLMDC-24148367 filed by J.E. Dunn Construction Company, Sean T Paddock. (Attachments: #1 State Court Second Amended Complaint, #2 State Court Docket Sheet Docket, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richardson, Nicholas) Modified text on 11/24/2025 (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Paddock et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Mitchell
Represented By: Leonard Raymond Carapella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sean T. Paddock
Represented By: Amanda Laura Piccininni
Represented By: Nicholas Edwin Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J.E. Dunn Construction Group, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda Laura Piccininni
Represented By: Nicholas Edwin Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?