Accuhealth Technologies, LLC et al v. Huerta Perezet al
| Accuhealth Technologies, LLC, Stephen J Rahel Samson and Boby Deveros |
| Orscar Gerardo Huerta Perez, Mauricio De Antunano Ruiz, Alejandra Eternod Valdez, Licenciado Luis Gerardo Ma Viramontes, Sebastian Vazquez Villasuso, Sofia Caren Celis Gutierrez and Ana Karen Ordaz Lara |
| 8:2026cv00455 |
| February 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 AMENDED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Accuhealth Technologies, LLC, Boby Deveros, Stephen J Rahel Samson. (Gangi, Alicia) Modified on 4/8/2026 to edit docket text. (AR) |
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER: The plaintiffs' Corporate Disclosure Statement (Doc. #6) does not meet the standards this Court requires to effectively screen cases for potential conflicts. The plaintiffs must submit a proper disclosure statement using the template available on the undersigned's website under the "forms" tab (and attached to Doc. #10) no later than April 7, 2026. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 4/2/2026. (GTD)
|
|
Filing 10
CIVIL CASE STANDING ORDER. The parties shall meet and file a Case Management Report using the standard form on the Court's website within forty days after any Defendant appears. Each nongovernmental party must also file a Corporate Disclosure Statement using the standard template attached to this Order (also available on the undersigned's website under the "forms" tab) within fourteen days after appearing. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 2/27/2026. (GTD)
|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS issued as to Sofia Caren Celis Gutierrez, Mauricio De Antunano Ruiz, Alejandra Eternod Valdez, Orscar Gerardo Huerta Perez, Ana Karen Ordaz Lara, Sebastian Vazquez Villasuso. (MSN) |
| Filing 8 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Accuhealth Technologies, LLC, Boby Deveros, Stephen J Rahel Samson. (McConnell, Beatriz) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Alicia Gangi on behalf of Accuhealth Technologies, LLC, Boby Deveros, Stephen J Rahel Samson (Gangi, Alicia) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 3.03 by Accuhealth Technologies, LLC, Boby Deveros, Stephen J Rahel Samson. (Heller, Samuel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Accuhealth Technologies, LLC, Boby Deveros, Stephen J Rahel Samson. Related case(s): Yes (Heller, Samuel) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Beatriz McConnell on behalf of Accuhealth Technologies, LLC, Boby Deveros, Stephen J Rahel Samson (McConnell, Beatriz) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:26-cv-455-KKM-AEP. (RLD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance and Lead Counsel Designation by Samuel Jason Heller on behalf of Accuhealth Technologies, LLC, Boby Deveros, Stephen J. Rahel Samson. Lead Counsel: Samuel J. Heller. (Heller, Samuel) Modified on 2/19/2026 to edit the docket text (MLB). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-24487839) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Heller, Samuel) Modified on 2/19/2026 to edit the docket text (MLB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
