Hewitt v. Hibbert et al
| Samuel Matthew Hewitt |
| Ramone K. Hibbert, Carlos A. Rivera Saez, Chad Chronister and Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office |
| 8:2026cv00581 |
| March 4, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Lindsay S Griffin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: The plaintiff Hewitt's motion, Doc. #2, to proceed in forma pauperis is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT pending his filing of an amended complaint that comports with Rules 8 and 10, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that states a viable claim. If he chooses to amend, Hewitt must file the amended complaint no later than May 15, 2026. Failure to file an amended complaint may result in a recommendation that the district judge dismiss Hewitt's complaint, Doc. #1, and deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. #2. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lindsay S. Griffin on 4/24/2026. (ML)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Samuel Matthew Hewitt. (LD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Lindsay S. Griffin. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Samuel Matthew Hewitt.(LD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
